Chris --
Again, please accept my apology for having delayed so long in
responding. I have eliminated a number of irons in my proverbial fire, so
shouldn't have this mess again. For me, this is an important correspondence
that we are having because it relates so tangibly to what I am trying to
impart in my book.
How hast thou fallen from heaven, Helel's son Shaher!
Thou didst say in thy heart, I will ascend to Heaven.
Above the circumpolar stars I will raise my throne
And I will dwell on the Mount of Council in the back of the North
I will mount on the back of a cloud.
I will be like unto Elyon.
Godwin says, "This ancient epic was recorded seven centuries before Christ in a Canaanite scripture. Five centuries later a Hebrew scribe copied it almost verbatim . . ." The source is not here given, there is no index, and there is no bibliography. However, unlike many of these Angel dictionaries, this one seems well researched otherwise, with sources often noted. On pg. 116, there is a note under the subtitle "The Nephilim," which states, "Helel: Son of the Canaanite Shaher who is often identified with Lucifer himself. But he is really the leader of the Nephelim, those gigantic offspring who were sired by the angels upon the daughters of Cain. These Nephelim were the builders of the Tower of Babel." At the beginning of this segment, "The Hordes of Hell," the author notes, "The following diagrams of Hell have been compiled from less questionable sources although it must be admitted the veracity of many of those sources might be in question." NO DOUBT! But the point is that he has refuted his earlier translation by saying in this second quote that Helel was a son of Shaher. If the man really is quoting from a Canaanite text, he has turned his words around in the important portion. I begin to doubt that he is quoting a Canaanite passage, because, as you will remember from my last post, we know "Mount of Council" should be translated "in the Assembled Body" and "in the back of the North" should be translated "Mount Sapon" *even* in the Hebrew. I'll write a letter to the author through the publisher, and we'll see if we can get some answers. It seems to me that the point in time at which the Canaanite text was inserted in the Bible is the moment that the "Morning Star --> devil" concept diverged from the "Morning Star --> goddess" concept for all time in the eyes of Christians and Jews. What I mean by that is that the use of "ben" in the Hebrew likely indicates the use of a similar word in the Canaanite (IF the Canaanite exists), but that, at any rate, "Lucifer" never was a *son* of "the Dawn" anyway, but *a daughter!* So, in fact, the reference was to Ashtar. ALSO -- The most modern Canaanite text I know of at all dates to 14th century BC (Ugarit). The Larousse says there are at present four groups of texts: (1) Gubla near Beirut, dated to c. 3,000 BC; (2) Ugarit, which is today Ras Shamrah, dated to first half of the 14th century BC; (3) a group which consists of inscriptions and illustrations on monuments, and the literary works of Philo of Byblos, Damascius, Mochus, the Bible, and Assyrian and Egyptian texts; and (4) Carthaginian documents and information obtained from the archaeological digs at Carthage. Apparently Godwin is not talking about Ugarit or Gubla. Our quote, which is supposed to have been written by Isaiah, is considered to have been written 736-35 BC, which is right at the "seven centuries before Christ" Godwin is claiming for his "Canaanite" text.
Another possibility -- Note that in my last post to you the Hebrew word is noted as "hel-lel" in the footnote of the New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures, and that you say in the Phoenician FAQ that "Mt. Lel" is where El lives. Could "Hel-lel" be "Hel of Lel?" Often the Morning Star and Sun are associated with a particular mountain, and the Morning Star Goddess is called the "Torch-Bearer" or "Light-Carrier" of the Sun (even "Path-Sweeper"). I don't have a copy of any but the Romanized Hebrew, but in it I see that Helel is designated as "heeyeel ben-shaaxar." The New World Translation is an original translation, however, so I don't doubt that it's probably significant that it says "hel-lel." Even this Romanized "heeyeel" translates for all extents and purposes to "hel" elongated. My sister-in-law is a Jehovah's Witness and I'll ask her if she'll find me references on this when she's back from her trip to Salt Lake. She has a couple of nice reference sets of books that refer to the various translations her church has decided are correct. These give other references.
BTW -- Sitchin (The 12th Planet) says the Way of Enlil was the northern hemisphere's zodiac, the Way of Enki was the southern hemisphere's zodiac, and the Way of Anu was what we now refer to as the path of the planets as they cross our night sky.
The Encyclopedia of the Bible (edited originally Marijnen)
says about Melech: "`King.' Name
of a deity venerated by the Ammonites under the name of Milcom. The Israelites worshipped
him under the name of Molech." And under Molech: "A West Semitic (especially Canaanitic
and Phoenician) deity." Also, "In the Hebrew O.T. the form is actually Molek. The etymology
of the word is uncertain; it means `king' in Hebrew and `prince' or `regent' in Akkadian, where
it takes the form Malik or . . . Malkum." The Larousse says the Baal of Tyre was solar and was
later also marine. It says his title was "Melkart, `God of the City.'" And it says Philo, in his
History of the Uranides," identified Melkart with Heracles (born of Demarus). We both know
Philo is a bunch of runtogether nonsense, but sometimes it contains clues. The interesting
fellow that posted us from Spain on alt.mythology said in his post I received Wed. night that
Indro Montanelli in History of Rome, Ch. XII, "Carthage" (he's translating from the Spanish)
says: "Of course, Carthaginians had too their gods. They had brought them from their mother
country, Phoenicia, but they changed their names. In exchange of Baal-Moloch and Astarte, as
they were called in Tyr and Sidon, they called them Baal-Haman and Tanit. Behind those there
were Melkarth, which means `key of the city,' Eshmun, lord of riches and health, and finally,
Dido herself, the founder of the city, which had the same place in Carthage than Quirinus in
Rome." It sounds like they may have taken apart their god into two gods!
I am seeing a pattern here: (1) The Christians have "God" and other people's deities are called
"gods." (2) "El" is the high god of the Phoenician pantheon, and everyone else wants to say it
just means "god." (3) "Baal" is the son of the Phoenician high god, a god in his own right, and
every town around takes on their own deity and calls it "Baal-whatever," which they say means
"Lord Whatever." (4) "Malik" probably means something cool, but every god of a city starts
being called "Melech," because it's a cool thing to be called. (5) And every goddess no one can
figure out should either be called "Astarte," or the modern thing to do with them is throw all
unknown goddesses in a pile with all known goddesses and name it "Great Goddess."
"Latpon El Dped answered: `I shall labor, I, the magician of Asherat.
I shall work, I who perceive. Behold, Amat Asherat fashions the
bricks. A house shall be constructed for Baal, for he is a god; and a
holy enclosure, for he is a son of Asherat.'
"And the Lady Asherat-of-the-Sea, of all the gods Mistress in Wisdom, said: `Rest
from thy toil, for thou art of great age. Rest, because of thy
lungs...And delight also in his rain.'"
The stories of Keret and Danel are called legends of mortals in the Larousse. Keret is son of El and a mortal woman. This Epic of Keret (Ugaritic) is a different story than the one you tell. What is your source for "demoness" in reference to Sha'taqat? Are you sure this isn't an underworld deity? The Larousse says Keret was a "soldier of the goddess Sapas" and king of Sidon. It goes on to say that El ordered him to resist an invasion by Etrah, or Terah, a moon god. Allied with the enemy were the tribe Zabulon (later a portion of the Israelites) and the Koserites (enemies also of the Egyptians). The battle took place in the Negeb to the south of Palestine. He later paid for his wife in gold and silver, but The Larousse says, "he does not seem to have emerged victorious from the struggle."
The Larousse says El made the rivers flow into the abyss of the ocean and thus assured the fertility of the earth. He was sometimes represented as a bull. The Facts On File Encyclopedia of World Mythology and Legend, by Anthony S. Mercatante, gives El the epithet "Creator of creation." Among the most frequent Old Testament titles of El are: El Shadday (Mercatante - El, the One of Mountains), El Olam (El of Eternity, worshipped at Beer Sheba), El-Bethel (El of the House of El, appeared to Jacob), El Berith (El of the Covenant). Elohim is the plural of El; it designates the pantheon.
A special sacrifice in the season of the harvest, to reawaken the spirit of the vine which the ass, nibbling the leaves, might have eaten, shows Qadesh and Amurru - in other words, Anat and Aleyin - intervening. Asherat-of-the-Sea gives them the following order:
Tie up the ass, bind the stallion. Make ready the vine-shoots with silvery leaves - of vivid green. Remove the she-asses from the vine. Qadesh and Amurru obey.
Qadesh is a title of Anat, meaning "holy" or "sacred." More about that in the next section.
I hope you find lots to chew on here. Let me know what you think. Could you post me back quick so I'll know you got this?
Gwen